From the category archives:

Industry News

Intel to Acquire McAfee, Moving Into Online Security

The New York Times is reporting that Intel, the chip maker, has turned into Intel, the security specialist.

The entrance to Intel’s campus in Hillsboro, Ore. Intel’s move to buy McAfee is its biggest effort to date to expand beyond its core chip-making business.

Making one of most eye-catching moves in its 42-year history, Intel announced Thursday that it planned to acquire McAfee for $7.68 billion in cash.

Under the terms of the deal, Intel will pay $48 a share in cash, a 60 percent premium over McAfee’s Wednesday closing stock price of $29.93.

The deal makes Intel a major player in the security software and services market. As such, Intel will shed some of its identity as a component supplier and climb higher up the technology food chain.

Intel expects the market for security technology to grow as electronic gadgets and things like cars and home appliances increase their computing power and tap into the Internet.

Analysts expect that many of the tools that McAfee provides today may be built-in to chips and devices over time.

“Eventually the software features will get embedded in the hardware,” said Ashok Kumar, a technology analyst with Rodman & Renshaw. “So, maybe this is an expensive way for Intel to acquire domain expertise.”

Intel’s chief executive, Paul S. Otellini, said in a statement: “With the rapid expansion of growth across a vast array of Internet-connected devices, more and more of the elements of our lives have moved online. In the past, energy-efficient performance and connectivity have defined computing requirements. Looking forward, security will join those as a third pillar of what people demand from all computing experiences.”

Intel, the world’s largest chip maker, has recovered from the recession well, posting record sales in recent quarters. Its results have been aided by rising sales of PCs to both consumers and businesses, and the expanded use of servers and data centers. After its most recent quarter, Intel had about $12.2 billion in cash and short-term investments on hand.

Still, the company’s efforts to put new flavors of lower-power chips into smartphones, TVs, cars and other devices have been slow. As a result, investors have been reluctant to view Intel as a growth bet and continue to see the company as tied to the PC.

The company’s share price has fallen about 20 percent in the last five years, closing on Wednesday at $19.59 a share.

Intel, however, has been bulking up its software arsenal. Last year, it bought Wind River for $884 million, giving it a software maker with a presence in the consumer electronics and wireless markets.

With McAfee, Intel will take hold of a company that sells antivirus software to consumers and businesses and a suite of more sophisticated security products and services aimed at corporations.

In addition, it gives the Silicon Valley veteran a potentially steadier revenue stream than it has found through the often booming and busting computer chip market, since much of the security software is sold on a subscription basis.

McAfee’s revenue rose 20 percent last year to $1.93 billion. Intel’s revenue fell 7 percent to $35.1 billion. At 80 percent, McAfee’s gross margins surpass Intel’s, which tend to be around 65 percent.

The companies are both based in Santa Clara, Calif., with head offices about a mile from each other.

{ 0 comments }

Security concerns over Facebook

by Bill Cullifer on July 30, 2010

PC World is reporting on The Facebook Data Torrent Debacle: Q&A

According to punlish rports web security concerns over Facebook have been raised yet again after a security consultant collected the names and profile URLs for 171 million Facebook accounts from publicly available information. The consultant, Ron Bowes, then uploaded the data as a torrent file allowing anyone with a computer connection to download the data.

Simon Davies a representative of the U.K.-based privacy watchdog Privacy International accused Facebook of negligence over the data mining technique, according to the BBC. Facebook, however, told the British news service that Bowes actions haven’t exposed anything new since all the information Bowes collected was already public.

So what are the security risks? Should you be concerned? Let’s take a look.

What data was collected?

Ron Bowes, a security consultant and blogger at Skull Security, used a piece of computer script to scan Facebook profiles listed in Facebook’s public profile directory. Using the script Bowes collected the names and profile URLs for every publicly searchable Facebook profile. All together, Bowes said he was able to collect names and Web addresses for 171 million Facebook users. That’s a little more than a third Facebook’s 500 million users. (Click image above to zoom)

What did he do with the data?

Bowes compiled this list of text into a file and made it available online as a downloadable torrent.

How many people have downloaded the torrent?

The Pirate Bay lists 2923 seeds and 9473 leechers for the torrent file at the time of this writing. Seeds are people who have downloaded the entire file and are uploading to others. Leechers are actively downloading the file.

Is this a big deal?

That depends on who you ask. Facebook points out that some of the data Bowes collected was already available through search engines like Google and Bing. The entire data set is also available to any user signed into Facebook. So the data was already publicly available, and nobody’s private Facebook data has been compromised. Nevertheless, this is the first time that 171 million Facebook profile names have been collected into one set of files that can be easily analyzed and searched by anyone.

What could a malicious hacker use the data for?

As Bowes pointed out in a blog post, someone could use this data as a starting point to find other publicly available user data on Facebook. After all, you have to wonder how many of these 171 million Facebook users have publicly exposed e-mail addresses, phone numbers and other information on their profiles?

It has been proven time and again that the more a bad guy knows about you the greater your security risk is. Collecting personal data allowed a French hacker to steal confidential corporate documents at Twitter. Researchers were alarmed when Netflix wanted to release anonymous user data including age, gender and ZIP code for the Netflix Prize 2. Security researchers said the data dump by Netflix was irresponsible since it is possible to narrow down a person’s identity just by knowing their age and ZIP code. The contest was eventually canceled. One Carnegie-Mellon study also found a flaw in the social security numbering system that could allow a sophisticated hacker using data mining techniques to uncover up to 47 social security numbers a minute.

How do I know if my name was caught in the data dump?

From your Facebook profile dashboard click on ‘Account’ in the upper right hand side of your dashboard. Select ‘Privacy Settings,’ and then on the next page under ‘Basic Directory Information’ click on ‘View Settings.’ You should see a page similar to the image above. If the first listing called “Search for me on Facebook” is set to “Everyone.” Then chances are, your name and profile URL are in the torrent file. (Click image to zoom)

You should also check to see if external search engines like Google and Bing are indexing your profile. To do this go back to your main privacy settings page, and at the bottom click on the “Edit Settings” button next to “Public Search.” On the next page, if the “Enable public search” check box is ticked then search engines are indexing your profile. To stop this just uncheck the box and then click on “Back to Applications.”

My name is not in the public directory should I be concerned?

If you were not in the public directory Bowes says your name is not in the torrent file. However, you could be exposed to similar data mining techniques in the future. Bowes says that if any of your Facebook connections have made their friends lists public then your profile could easily be found through data mining your friends’ profiles.

What can I do to keep my information private?

The biggest concern isn’t so much about your name and profile URL being exposed. The greater concern, for you anyway, is the publicly available information contained on your profile page.

To protect yourself, you may want to reconsider your current privacy settings. To do that visit your Facebook profile’s Basic Directory Information page by following the steps listed above or just click here.

On the top right of the page you should see a button that says “Preview My Profile.” Clicking that button will show you all the information you make public on Facebook. Data you may want to consider hiding includes your hometown, birth date, age, phone number, current city and e-mail address.

So what do you say? Is Bowes’ data dump making your rethink your Facebook profile settings or are you not concerned?

{ 1 comment }

The Power of Platforms – A Web Professional Perspective and Overview of the Web 2.0 2010 Event San Francisco, CA

The Web 2.0 Conference took place earlier in the month in San Francisco, CA and WOW’s roving reporter Jeri Hastava, principle of Leap of Faith Web Design was on hand to conduct a number of in depth interviews on the going’s on with in depth coverage of the more meaningful sessions for the practicing Web professional.

Today’s podcast is an overview of that event featuring the conference theme, “Power of the Platform” followed by an overview by Jerri of the following sessions that she sat in on and what you can expect of her in depth interviews of the speakers that we will be featuring in future podcast later this week and next.

Thank you Jeri!

 
icon for podpress  Power of the Platform: A Web Professional Overview of the Web 2.0 Event San Francisco: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Overview

* Being Optimally Social – How Not Talking about Your Product Can Bring Huge Rewards
Social Media Marketing with Rand Fishkin, CEO & Co-Founder (SEOmoz), Stephan Spencer, VP of SEO Strategies (Covario)
These two co-authors of O’Reilly’s “The Art of SEO” will go beyond friending, following, digging and tweeting to discuss clever and novel ways to leverage social media, communities, and user-generated content that your organization is likely not doing.

* Web Design Redefined, with Web Fonts with Allan Haley, Director of Words & Letters (Monotype Imaging)
Typography has often been a thorn in the side of Web designers who have traditionally been confined to a limited number of system fonts or forced to embed type within graphics. New technologies promise to bring Web designers the same level of typographic choice and freedom that print designers enjoy. Discover more about the emerging world of Web typography how it will impact you.

* Social Media: A Cautionary Tale: Focus on Enterprise with Mike Gotta. Principal Analyst (Burton Group), Alice Wang, Director (Burton Group)
As social media solutions become more complex, IT organizations are becoming more involved to work with business strategists on ways to mitigate risks. Security, compliance, confidentiality, data loss prevention, brand reputation, and human resource concerns (i.e., ethics/conduct) are issues that organizations cannot ignore.

* Upgrade Your Mandate – From User Experience to Customer Experience Strategy & Business Models with Peter Merholz, Founder & President (Adaptive Path)
Your customers lead multi-channel lives. So why are you focused on just one? In this talk, Peter Merholz will lay out a strategy for “Web + 1″, connecting the web to other service touchpoints, and how to address the organizational challenges in doing so.

Today’s Web Pro Minute is sponsored by the Microsoft WebsiteSpark Program.

Join WebsiteSpark today and take advantage of this exclusive offer:

Web Developers and Designers: we wanted to let you know about Microsoft WebsiteSpark, a great new program just for you.
Join WebsiteSpark today and get three Visual Studio(R) Professional licenses at no cost*.

WebsiteSpark is for web development and design firms with fewer than 10 employees. Sign up to receive:

Technical Benefits

- Three Visual Studio(R) 2008 licenses,
- Two Expression(R) Web 3 licenses plus an Expression Studio 3 license,
- One Windows Web Server(R) 2008 R2 license.
- One SQL Server(R) 2008 Web Edition license.

Business Benefits

- Get new business leads through the Build a Better Website campaign.

http://agency.buildabetterwebsite.com/

- Take advantage of a year’s hosting for Windows Web Server.

http://wssoffer.buildabetterwebsite.com/

- Access technical support from the Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN).
- Receive training on how to make the most of WebsiteSpark.

http://www.msdev.com/partner/Program.aspx?benefitId=80

Do I Qualify?

WebsiteSpark is available to professional Web developers and designers. To qualify, your firm must:

1. Build web sites and web applications for other organizations.
2. Have fewer than 10 employees.

*At the end of the three year program there is a one-time $100 program fee.

{ 0 comments }

HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash

by Bill Cullifer on April 30, 2010

HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash: Where do you stand?

The controversy for the “hearts and minds” of Web professionals heats up as press reports reflect that Steve Jobs goes public with a statement that Adobe’s Flash software has fallen short as a mobile technology. At issue is the public debate between the companies over the program used to create online video. Clearly, the case for HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash is sure to intensify in the weeks and months to come.

The Story Line

Apple has “few joint interests” with Adobe, Mr. Jobs said in a post on Apple’s Web page Thursday, citing six reasons he doesn’t want Flash for mobile devices. He called the program closed and proprietary, saying the decision to bar it from Apple’s devices is based on technology, not business.

Apple’s efforts to convince programmers to adopt other ways to get video to work on Web sites threatens Flash’s dominance. San Jose, Calif.-based Adobe is fighting for the hearts and minds of Web-site developers, many of whom view Apple’s iPhone, iPod Touch and newly released iPad tablet as platforms they can’t ignore.

HTML5, a standard Apple uses instead of Flash, is a “completely open” technology, said Mr. Jobs. HTML5 lets Web developers create graphics and animations without relying on third-party browser plug-ins, such as Flash, he said.

“Perhaps Adobe should focus more on creating great HTML5 tools for the future, and less on criticizing Apple for leaving the past behind,” Mr. Jobs said according to press reports.

Adobe highlighted the risks of exclusion from Apple’s iPhone and iPad devices for the first time in a regulatory filing this month, signalling the snub could hurt sales according t the report.

More than 75% of online videos run on Flash, and the software is installed on about 98% of personal computers connected to the Internet, according to Adobe. Flash also runs on more than 800 million mobile phones, manufactured by 19 of the top 20 handset makers — all except Apple.

{ 6 comments }

 
icon for podpress  Adobe Systems Flash Player for Mobile Devices Delayed: A Small Business Web Professional Perspective : Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Adobe Systems Flash Player for Mobile Devices Delayed: A Small Business Web Professional Shares Thoughts

For today’s podcast, I caught up with Alex Von Allman, CEO at BrandMother.com a Web professional firm that specializes in small business. I asked Alex to comment on a Fox Business report of Adobe’s CEO Shantanu Narayen said the mobile Flash Player for Android, Palm, BlackBerry, and Symbian phones is not ready for release. “The second part of this year is when you are going to see Flash on a number of those devices,” according to the Adobe interview.

Alex shares his thoughts on how it affects him personally, his clients and his future plans.

{ 0 comments }

 
icon for podpress  Flash Video: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

HTML 5 Update, Timetable and What you Can Expect

In this four minute interview with Professor Mark DuBois, Instructor at Illinois Central College and WOW’s Director of Education. Mark provides us with an HTML 5 update including what’s the current best practice and what will practicing professionals and those that teach need to know to stay current.

Mark also addresses recommendations for educators that have a need to incorporate current HTML specifications program of studies. Check out today’s Web Pro Minute.

Today’s Web Professional Minute is sponsored by the following events. If you’re looking for education and training in information technology, Web 2.0, Web Design or Mobile we would encourage you to consider participating in these fine events.

Voices That Matter
iPhone Developers Conference
Bell Harbor International Conference Center
Seattle, Washington
April 24 and 25, 2010

Interop Las Vegas 2010
April 25-30, 2010
Mandalay Bay Convention Center
Interop LasVegas

Web 2.0 Expo San Francisco 2010Co-produced by O’Reilly Media, Inc. and TechWeb May 3-6, 2010 San Francisco
WOW Members Get a Discount!

Voices That Matter San Francisco, CA
June 28-29, 2010

Build Your Skills with the Leading Web Design Authors
Register Today!

Web design is undergoing an historic transformation: while the basics of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript haven’t changed, the new and evolving functionality in the HTML5 and CSS3 specs, the number of new ways in which people access the Web, and the rise of social media mean that Web designers need to know more than ever. Whether it’s a smarter content strategy, a more efficient workflow, or simply how to use drop shadows and an expanded typographic repertoire, you need the tools to build tomorrow’s Web today.
Register Today!

More on HTML 5

According to Wikipedia, HTML5 is being developed as the next major revision of HTML (HyperText Markup Language), the core markup language of the World Wide Web. The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) started work on the specification in June 2004 under the name Web Applications As of March 2010, the specification is in the Draft Standard state at the WHATWG, and in Working Draft state at the W3C.

HTML5 is the proposed next standard for HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0 and DOM Level 2 HTML. It aims to reduce the need for proprietary plug-in-based rich internet application (RIA) technologies such as Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight, Apache Pivot, and Sun JavaFX.

The ideas behind HTML5 were pioneered in 2004 by the WHATWG; HTML5 incorporates Web Forms 2.0, another WHATWG specification. The HTML5 specification was adopted as the starting point of the work of the new HTML working group of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in 2007. This working group published the First Public Working Draft of the specification on January 22, 2008. The specification is an ongoing work, and is expected to remain so for many years, although parts of HTML5 are going to be finished and implemented in browsers before the whole specification reaches final Recommendation status.[

HTML5 introduces a number of new elements and attributes that reflect typical usage on modern Web sites. Some of them are semantic replacements for common uses of generic block

) and inline () elements, for example (website navigation block) and (usually refer to bottom of web page or to last lines of html code). Other elements provide new functionality through a standardized interface, such as the and [4] elements.

Some deprecated elements from HTML 4.01 have been dropped, including purely presentational elements such as and, whose effects are achieved using Cascading Style Sheets. There is also a renewed emphasis on the importance of DOM scripting in Web behavior.

The HTML5 syntax is no longer based on SGML despite the similarity of its markup. It has, however, been designed to be backward compatible with common parsing of older versions of HTML. It comes with a new introductory line that looks like an SGML document type declaration, , which enables standards-compliant rendering in all browsers that use “DOCTYPE sniffing”.
[edit] New APIs

In addition to specifying markup, HTML5 specifies scripting application programming interfaces (APIs).[6] Existing document object model (DOM) interfaces are extended and de facto features documented. There are also new APIs, such as:

* The canvas element for immediate mode 2D drawing
* Timed media playback
* Offline storage database
* Document editing
* Drag-and-drop
* Cross-document messaging
* Browser history management
* MIME type and protocol handler registration.

Some of the new features are part of HTML5 mainly because there are no volunteers to split HTML5 and maintain separate specifications of these features.
Differences from HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.x

The following is a cursory list of differences and some specific examples.

* New parsing rules oriented towards flexible parsing and compatibility; not based on SGML
* Ability to use inline SVG and MathML in text/html
* New elements – article, aside, audio, canvas, command, details, datalist, dialog, embed, figure, figcaption, footer, header, hgroup, keygen, mark, meter, nav, progress, output, rp, rt, ruby, section, source, summary, time, video
* New types of form controls – dates and times, email, url, search
* New attributes – ping (on a and area), charset (on meta), async (on script)
* Global attributes (that can be applied for every element) – id, tabindex, hidden, data-* (custom data attributes)
* Forms will get support for PUT and DELETE methods too instead of just GET and POST (see Representational State Transfer for use cases)
* Deprecated elements dropped – center, font, frameset, strike

Error handling

An HTML5 (text/html) browser will be flexible in handling incorrect syntax. HTML5 is designed so that old browsers can safely ignore new HTML5 constructs. In contrast to HTML 4.01, the HTML5 specification gives detailed rules for lexing and parsing, with the intent that different compliant browsers will produce the same result in the case of incorrect syntax.
Completion

According to the W3C timetable, it is estimated that HTML5 will reach W3C Recommendation by late 2010. However, the First Public Working Draft estimate was missed by 8 months, and Last Call and Candidate Recommendation were expected to be reached in 2008,[9] but as of April 2010[update] HTML5 is still at Working Draft stage in the W3C. HTML5 has been at Last Call in the WHATWG since October 2009.

Ian Hickson, editor of the HTML5 specification, expects the specification to reach the W3C Candidate Recommendation stage during 2012, and W3C Recommendation in the year 2022 or later. However, many parts of the specification are stable and may be implemented in products:

{ 0 comments }

Yelp’s Mounting Troubles: Can they be trusted?

by Bill Cullifer on April 8, 2010

Yelp Inc.’s legal challenges continue to pile up, with business around the country weighing in on third class-action lawsuits.

According to press reports the pending class action lawsuits alleges that the San Francisco, CA based website of user reviews and recommendations of top restaurants, shopping, nightlife, extorts companies by manipulating ratings or visibility on the site based on whether or not the businesses pay to advertise.

Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp’s chief executive, denies the charges—blaming them partly on businesses misunderstandings about Yelp’s rating system and lawyers’ desires to spur litigation.

But the disputes point up a sticky problem for many community-generated Web sites: How to manage user ratings—and build an advertising-supported business—while policing such schemes from abuse.

Yelp, which is five years old, relies on volunteers to review restaurants, stores and other businesses. The company claims more than 26 million visitors a month.

It generates revenue by selling advertising services to businesses, including the ability to add text links on the site and add additional information to the user-generated reviews page.

Since its early days, the company has employed a filtering system that is designed to prevent businesses from distorting ratings by, say, getting employees or friends to post glowing reviews. Mr. Stoppelman attributes the recent complaints to confusion over how that filtering system operates according to the report.

{ 0 comments }

U.S. Decides to Relax Restrictions to Export Internet Technologies to Iran and Cuba

Google executive welcomed on Tuesday a U.S. decision to relax restrictions on exporting Internet communications services to Iran, Sudan and Cuba according to press reports.

Bob Boorstin, Google’s director of policy communications, said the Web search company would now be able to offer some of its other products in those countries, such as the mapping satellite software Google Earth, photo management program Picasa and Internet chat client Google Talk.

“This is a great accomplishment,” Boorstin told a human rights meeting in Geneva. “We are hopeful this will help people like yourselves in this room and activists all over the world take a small step down what is certainly a long road ahead.”

The U.S. Treasury Department said the change to existing trade sanctions was intended to help people “exercise their most basic rights” with the help of instant messaging service and e-mail.
Google itself has come under fire recently in countries where it operates.

{ 0 comments }

Google the 800 lb Guerrilla?

by Bill Cullifer on March 3, 2010

Microsoft CEO: Google merits regulatory scrutiny

Recent press reports reflect that CEO Steve Ballmer intends to keep the regulatory heat on Google as his company strives to lessen its rival’s dominance of Internet search stating that Google merits regulatory scrutiny.

According to AP, In an appearance Tuesday at a search engine conference, Ballmer said Microsoft believes Google Inc. has done things to gain an unfair advantage in the Internet’s lucrative search advertising market. He didn’t specify the alleged misconduct.

“We are expressing some of the issues and frustrations we see” with antitrust regulators, Ballmer said. “Sometimes (it’s) unsolicited, sometimes because we have been asked.” Google declined to comment Tuesday. But it has said its actions are aimed at providing better experiences for Web surfers and advertisers.

Yahoo Inc., which is about to team up with Microsoft in search, seems less inclined to get regulators involved as the two companies gang up on Google. “I am actually not interested in government intervention in anything,” Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz told reporters during a Tuesday lunch to celebrate the company’s 15th anniversary. “I think for the most part markets work. I don’t wish antitrust on anyone.”

Reports from the event Microsoft already has helped convince U.S. regulators that Google would break antitrust laws in two proposed deals: a search advertising partnership with Yahoo that was scrapped in 2008 and a digital books settlement that still needs federal court approval. Yahoo also lobbied regulators to oppose the agreement that would give Google the electronic rights to millions of hard-to-find books.

Ciao, an online shopping comparison service owned by Microsoft, has filed an antitrust complaint against Google in Europe. Regulators there say they are looking into those allegations and similar ones made by two other sites, Foundem and ejustice.fr.

Microsoft, the world’s largest software maker, has had its own troubles with regulators. Its bundling of personal computer software triggered a court dispute with the U.S. Justice Department that forced the company to change the way it packages software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft later tussled with EU regulators, too.

Since Microsoft’s own antitrust showdown started in the late 1990s, more people have been relying on their computers chiefly as a conduit to the Internet. The evolution has turned Google’s Internet gateway and other online services into a major threat to Microsoft, which has tried to respond by investing billions of dollars in search technology.

Microsoft has made little headway. Even with some progress since unveiling an upgraded search engine called Bing nine months ago, Microsoft remains a distant third in the U.S. search market.

Ballmer is counting on Microsoft’s 10-year search partnership with No. 2 Yahoo to help close the gap. Regulators cited Google’s 65 percent share of the U.S. search market as one of the reasons for allowing Microsoft and Yahoo to work together.

When the alliance kicks in late this year, Microsoft will start processing search requests on Yahoo’s Web site and pay most of the ad revenue to its new partner. As Microsoft fields more search requests, Ballmer expects the company to collect more data that it could analyze and use to help improve search results. That, in turn, could help the company lure away Google users.

“There is an advantage to having the power of two, as opposed to the power of one,” Ballmer told the crowd at the Search Marketing Expo.

When asked whether he thought Microsoft would overtake Google in Internet search, Ballmer indicated it probably will be a long time before there’s a changing of the guard.

“I don’t know how old I will be when that will happen,” said Ballmer, 53.
As part of its efforts to challenge Google, Microsoft has sought help from Twitter and Facebook — two popular services for sharing information and photographs.

Microsoft, like Google and Yahoo, pays an undisclosed sum for better access to Twitter’s index of short messages. In a bigger partnership, Microsoft spent $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake in Facebook and processes search requests on that site.

Responding to questions, Ballmer played down the possibility of Microsoft buying Twitter or Facebook, which are both privately held.

Shares of Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Wash., fell 56 cents, or 1.9 percent, to close Tuesday at $28.46. Google, based in Mountain View, Calif., gained $8.37, or 1.6 percent, to $541.06, while Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Yahoo lost 6 cents to $15.73.

{ 0 comments }

Millennial Generation: A Pew Survey

by Bill Cullifer on February 25, 2010

Judy Woodruff, PBS News Hour takes a look at how the millennial generation — people born after 1980 — fits into the current political and economic spectrum. The Pew Center’s Paul Taylor and Amanda Lenhart discuss their new report.

They are 18 to 29 years old. There are some 50 million of them, and they’re often called the millennial generation.

Today, they were the subject of a conference at the Newseum in Washington, D.C. The event, for which PBS served as moderator, coincided with the release of a comprehensive national study conducted by the Pew Research Center.

Among its findings: Millennials are the most diverse generation in U.S. history. Only 61 percent are white, 19 percent Hispanic, 14 percent black, and 5 percent Asian. That contrasts with those 30 and older, a group that is 70 percent white.

The study also found that millennials are voracious users of new technologies, from smartphones to social networking sites. When respondents were asked if they sleep with their cell phone nearby, 83 percent of millennials said they did, far more than their parents or grandparents.

{ 0 comments }