<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times to Charge for Frequent Access to its Web Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webprofessionals.org/new-york-times-to-charge-for-frequent-access-to-its-web-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webprofessionals.org/new-york-times-to-charge-for-frequent-access-to-its-web-site/</link>
	<description>Professional association for web designers, developers, marketers, analysts and other web professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mar</title>
		<link>http://webprofessionals.org/new-york-times-to-charge-for-frequent-access-to-its-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webprofessionals.org/?p=1446#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I think this is a great idea.  The NYT is being quite generous to allow Sunday only readers full access to all articles.  Something needs to be done to save the print paper - this is an idea I have actually been discussing as a partial solution for some time.  All major papers should join in  lockstep.  It&#039;s only fair - why should those who enjoy &amp; subscribe to the print format underwrite free e-content for all, particularly at their own expense, i.e. unlimited free internet access has contributed to the demise of the newsPAPER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great idea.  The NYT is being quite generous to allow Sunday only readers full access to all articles.  Something needs to be done to save the print paper &#8211; this is an idea I have actually been discussing as a partial solution for some time.  All major papers should join in  lockstep.  It&#8217;s only fair &#8211; why should those who enjoy &amp; subscribe to the print format underwrite free e-content for all, particularly at their own expense, i.e. unlimited free internet access has contributed to the demise of the newsPAPER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

